Environmental groups also support a U.N.-brokered solution.
"The better step is for the United States, Europe, and other countries to work together with airlines and civil society to craft a global solution and enforceable domestic measures," said a joint statement from the six groups, including WWF-UK and the U.S.-based Environmental Defense Fund.
EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard is in Washington this week to discuss the issue with Obama administration officials and members of Congress. She has said repeatedly the only reason for the EU to amend its new law would be a global agreement at the ICAO.
The initial cost to airlines globally is expected to be minimal but would rise to an estimated $12 billion (9 billion euros) by the end of 2020. The levy would apply to the entire length of an aircraft's journey to an EU airport, including the section outside EU airspace.
As well as the United States, China and India have complained that the EU went ahead with a program that applies to their airspace, while the EU says it was forced to act after years of international inaction on air travel pollution.
India said last week it would ignore a March 31 deadline for submitting data under the EU ETS. India's move followed noisy protests from China, which has linked suspension of $14 billion of jet orders from European planemaker Airbus, an EADS unit, to its fury with the EU.
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
0 comments:
Post a Comment