Fran Jacobs, a lawyer for the defendants, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The SEC accused Reserve, Bent and a son of fraudulently dissuading nervous investors from redeeming shares in Reserve Primary on Sept. 15-16, 2008, hours after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc had gone bankrupt, and representing that the fund was safe.
Instead, Reserve Primary became the second money fund to fall below $1 per share, known as "breaking the buck," when its share price dropped to 97 cents on Sept. 16, 2008.
The fund had held $785 million of Lehman debt. Its collapse was a key driver of the credit market seizure that followed Lehman's demise. New regulations have since reduced the credit and maturity risks that money funds may take.
By January 2010, Reserve said it had distributed nearly all of the $50.5 billion left in Reserve Primary after Lehman's bankruptcy. Investors recovered about 99 cents on the dollar.
In a court filing, Reserve and the Bents said any statements they may have made to induce investors to hold onto their shares were neither material nor made with fraudulent intent. They also said there are no ill-gotten gains to recover, and that an injunction is not needed to prevent a recurrence.
The SEC disagreed. "What happened on September 15 and 16 was not an isolated, uncharacteristic lapse of long-standing compliance; it was just another -- much more serious -- instance of defendants' disregard for their obligations to abide by the securities laws," it said in another court filing.
The case is SEC v. Reserve Management Co et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-04346.
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
0 comments:
Post a Comment