Sunday, March 31, 2013

Reuters: Regulatory News: Panasonic unit in U.S. bribery investigation - WSJ

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Panasonic unit in U.S. bribery investigation - WSJ
Apr 1st 2013, 01:25

NEW YORK, March 31 | Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:25pm EDT

NEW YORK, March 31 (Reuters) - A unit of Japan's Panasonic Corp is under investigation by U.S. authorities looking at whether the company paid bribes overseas to airline employees or government officials to help land business, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Citing company documents, the Journal said Panasonic Avionics had received a subpoena looking for communications between Panasonic Avionics, consultants and others. The subpoena also asked for documents related to payments to the airline employees and government officials, the newspaper said.

The Panasonic unit, which is headquartered in Lake Forest, California, makes in-flight entertainment and communications systems.

According to the Journal, notices were sent to executives and employees in Asia, Europe and the Middle East.

The Journal said it was not clear which U.S. agency is investigating the unit. But the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is enforced by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

A Panasonic Avionics spokesman told Reuters that the company does not comment on government investigations.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Mexican consumer protection agency files suit against Telmex

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Mexican consumer protection agency files suit against Telmex
Mar 31st 2013, 23:33

MEXICO CITY, March 31 | Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:33pm EDT

MEXICO CITY, March 31 (Reuters) - The Mexican government's consumer protection agency said on Sunday it had opened a class action lawsuit against Carlos Slim's fixed line phone company Telmex for making illegal charges.

Rafael Ochoa, a legal expert at the federal prosecutor's office for the consumer (Profeco), said Telmex had made unwarranted charges for a privacy service and that Profeco had filed the suit with a federal civil court in Mexico City.

Profeco took the step after noticing that Telmex was charging users some 10.40 pesos ($0.84) a month for a data protection service that was a constitutional right, said Ochoa.

It was unclear how many customers could join the suit and how much Telmex might be liable for, he noted.

"There's still not a precise estimate," Ochoa said, noting the period under scrutiny began in March 2012. He added that he expected a judge to rule on the case in around six months.

Telmex did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Slim, the world's richest man, controls roughly 80 percent of Mexico's fixed line phone market and 70 percent of the country's mobile business through his giant phone company America Movil, of which Telmex is a part.

In February, Mexico's competition watchdog Cofeco said it would fine Telmex $52 million for monopolistic practices.

Slim's companies have successfully fought off a number of lawsuits in the past, but the billionaire is facing tougher regulation from President Enrique Pena Nieto's government.

On March 11, Pena Nieto unveiled the biggest planned shake-up of the Mexican telecommunications market in decades, a sweeping reform that aims to boost competition and give regulators the power to make dominant players sell assets.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Confirm your unsubscription from 'Reuters: Regulatory News'

To confirm that you no longer wish to receive updates from 'Reuters: Regulatory News', please click on the following link:

http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/confirm/hLMH3J/z7nRr


If you weren't expecting to receive this email, then simply ignore it and we'll go away.
Read more »

Confirm your unsubscription from 'Reuters: Regulatory News'

To confirm that you no longer wish to receive updates from 'Reuters: Regulatory News', please click on the following link:

http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/confirm/hLMH3J/nvDT5


If you weren't expecting to receive this email, then simply ignore it and we'll go away.
Read more »

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Reuters: Regulatory News: CORRECTED-Ex-Freddie execs lose bid to toss SEC lawsuit

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
CORRECTED-Ex-Freddie execs lose bid to toss SEC lawsuit
Mar 30th 2013, 18:27

Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:27pm EDT

(Corrects first paragraph to state that "two other one-time executives lost their bid" rather than "three other," and corrects typo in third paragraph: "exposure" instead of "exponsure")

By Nate Raymond

NEW YORK, March 29 (Reuters) - Former Freddie Mac chief executive Richard Syron and two other one-time executives lost their bid to escape a U.S. regulator's lawsuit accusing them of misleading investors about the company's exposure to risky mortgage loans.

U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan partially granted but otherwise denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, one of the biggest enforcement actions brought against executives spilling out of the financial crisis.

Sullivan in his Thursday ruling sided with the SEC, finding the lawsuit's allegations supported a plausible inference that Syron and Patricia Cook, Freddie Mac's former chief business officer, misrepresented the company's subprime exposure.

He also rejected the defendants' contention even if Syron and Cook verbally misrepresented Freddie's exposure, investors could have looked to detailed quantitative information to calculate its subprime exposure.

"In this case, the Court cannot conclude that no reasonable investor could have found the alleged misrepresentations and omissions to be material in light of the quantitative disclosures," Sullivan wrote.

The judge also allowed SEC claims against Donald Bisenius, a former executive vice president for Freddie's single family guarantee business.

Lawyers for Syron and Cook did not respond to requests for comment. Daniel Beller, a lawyer for Bisenius, declined comment. A spokesman for the SEC did not respond to a request for comment.

Syron, Cook and Bisenius were hit with the SEC lawsuit in December 2011, as the agency launched a similar lawsuit against three ex-Fannie Mae executives, including former chief executive Daniel Mudd.

U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty denied the Fannie executives' bids to dismiss the case against them August 2012.

In the Freddie Mac case, Syron and the other defendants also argued they were exempt from liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since Freddie, as a government-sponsored corporation, was an independent U.S. establishment.

Sullivan rejected that argument, saying "had Congress in 1970 or at any time since then wished to designate Freddie Mac as an independent establishment, it would have done so."

The case is: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Syron, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-09201. (Reporting by Nate Raymond; Editing by Leslie Gevirtz)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Friday, March 29, 2013

Reuters: Regulatory News: SEC again rejects copper users' challenges to JPMorgan ETF

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
SEC again rejects copper users' challenges to JPMorgan ETF
Mar 29th 2013, 22:04

Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:04pm EDT

* SEC says ETF would not lead to metal shortage

* Regulator upholds decision to approve JPM fund

By Josephine Mason

NEW YORK, March 26 (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has again rebuffed claims by copper fabricators that JPMorgan Chase & Co's planned exchange traded fund backed by physical copper would tighten supplies of metal used in plumbing and wiring.

In a filing dated March 28 and posted on the SEC website on Friday, the regulator upheld its Dec. 14 decision to approve the controversial fund, rejecting concerns among copper users that the fund would distort supply and inflate prices.

Industrial users fear the funds would cut off supplies of copper, used in wiring and plumbing, and boost prices since they will use physical copper cathode as collateral against shares of the fund, effectively removing a chunk of metal from the market.

There is no new evidence to suggest that the JPM XF Physical Copper Trust would lead to a scarcity of particular grades or brands of copper, the SEC said.

"The commission does not believe that ... as a result of the trust, it is much more likely that brand-sensitive end-users of copper will not be able to obtain their desired brands of copper at their desired locations," the filing said.

The latest missive came after a last-ditch effort by a consortium of copper users to get the SEC to reverse its decision. Their attorney Robert Bernstein with law firm Eaton & Van Winkle LLP asked the regulator in a letter dated Jan. 9 to block the fund.

Last month, two firms from the group, Southwire Co and Encore Wire Corp, said they were preparing to fight the ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals.

The consortium, which represents half the annual copper demand of the United States, has also opposed another, similar fund, the iShares Copper Trust, planned by BlackRock Inc . The SEC gave its seal of approval for that product last month.

This week's filing also rejected concerns raised in the January letter that long lines in some warehouses would delay investors getting their metal if they redeemed their shares in the trust for physical material.

The SEC said it expected that metal would be transferred to the relevant investor's account within three days of redemption, which it did not consider to be a "significant" delay.

It remained unclear when JPM may launch the fund after two years of work to get the approval in December.

JPMorgan and BlackRock have said fears about rising prices and supply squeezes are unfounded because the funds would be miniscule compared with the 20-million-tonne global market.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 1-Pair settles Nexen insider trading charges with SEC

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 1-Pair settles Nexen insider trading charges with SEC
Mar 29th 2013, 20:04

Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:04pm EDT

WASHINGTON, March 29 (Reuters) - A Chinese businessman and his wife agreed to settle insider trading charges for $3.3 million in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission probe into the $15.1 billion takeover of Canada's Nexen Inc.

The securities regulator said that the couple stocked up on Nexen shares knowing that the energy company was about to be acquired by state-owned energy company CNOOC Ltd in July, China's biggest-ever takeover.

Nexen stock jumped almost 52 percent on the announcement CNOOC had agreed to acquire the company, but the SEC soon got an emergency court order to freeze several trading accounts after it saw suspicious activity in the shares.

In October, Hong Kong-based Well Advantage Limited settled charges of $14 million with the SEC, paying back illegal profits made on the trades plus a penalty worth the same amount.

That was followed by the departure of Zhang Zhirong from the helm of China Rongsheng Heavy Industries Group, who owned Well Advantage. Rongsheng has a strategic cooperation agreement with CNOOC.

The SEC's probe had now identified Ren Feng and his wife Zeng Huiyu as previously unknown traders charged in the complaint, the watchdog said.

The agreement is subject to court approval. The defendants neither admit nor deny the SEC's allegations.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 1-Obama touts infrastructure in Florida trip focused on economy

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 1-Obama touts infrastructure in Florida trip focused on economy
Mar 29th 2013, 20:21

Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:21pm EDT

* "Let's rebuild this country," president says

* Unclear if Congress will support proposals

By Jeff Mason

MIAMI, March 29 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama walked into the mouth of a giant tunnel in Miami on Friday to highlight proposals to boost investment in U.S. infrastructure, a move designed to show a leader still focused on the economy in the midst of broader policy battles in Washington.

Obama's tour of the Port of Miami tunnel project and a subsequent speech were aimed at convincing members of the U.S. Congress to back proposals that would leverage taxpayer dollars into funds to rebuild American roads, bridges and other infrastructure.

"My main message is, let's get this done," he said. "Let's rebuild this country that we love."

Obama, as he has in the past, said he wanted to develop a national infrastructure bank and capitalize it with $10 billion. The idea is to pull in private-sector funding and pick projects based on merit.

He would also create "America Fast Forward Bonds" that would help state and local governments attract money for infrastructure projects. These would be direct subsidy bonds in which the issuer would receive a 28 percent subsidy of the borrowing cost as a way of attracting a wider set of investors.

In addition, Obama would add $4 billion to support two programs that are used to provide grants for infrastructure projects like the Miami tunnel.

It is unclear how far the proposals will go in Congress. Republicans are reluctant to support what they consider government stimulus spending after a much criticized $787 billion stimulus plan that Obama managed to push through Congress in 2009.

Florida's Republican governor, Rick Scott, said his state has been able to improve the Florida economy without Washington's assistance.

"In Florida, we've managed to grow jobs by cutting taxes, paying down debt and balancing the budget - a stark contrast to the ways of Washington," he said.

Obama noted that some people on both sides of the political spectrum, such as labor unions and the Chamber of Commerce, had supported his infrastructure ideas.

"Building bridges and schools, that's not a partisan idea," he said.

Obama was criticized in his first term for focusing too much on his signature policy goal of revamping the U.S. healthcare system, which critics said resulted in him giving less attention to the slow economic recovery.

The White House rejects that charge.

Since his re-election in November and his January inauguration, Obama has steered a policy push focused primarily on passing both immigration reform and tighter gun control measures.

However, his State of the Union address in February included a series of measures to boost the economy, and the Florida trip fleshed out some of those ideas.

Alan Krueger, Obama's chief economist, told reporters traveling with the president on Air Force One that the three main proposals outlined by Obama would cost some $21 billion but that cuts would be made elsewhere to avoid increasing the budget deficit.

Obama's fiscal 2014 budget proposal, which will be released on April 10, would spell out how they are paid for, he said. All of the proposals require congressional approval.

Although Obama will not run for re-election again, Florida is still important for him and his fellow Democrats. The political swing state backed the president in 2012 and will be critical to determining whether a Democrat holds on to the White House or whether a Republican recaptures it in 2016.

The White House believes an increase in infrastructure investment would make the United States more competitive while providing a boost to the construction industry, which is still suffering high levels of unemployment.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: U.S. FDA approves Johnson & Johnson diabetes drug, canagliflozin

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
U.S. FDA approves Johnson & Johnson diabetes drug, canagliflozin
Mar 29th 2013, 19:25

By Toni Clarke

March 29 | Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:25pm EDT

March 29 (Reuters) - U.S. health regulators have approved a new diabetes drug from Johnson & Johnson, making it the first in its class to be approved in the United States.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the drug, Invokana, after data showed it was effective in lowering blood sugar in patients with Type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the disease.

The FDA has asked for five postmarketing studies for the drug including a cardiovascular outcomes trial, an enhanced pharmacovigilance program, a bone safety study and two pediatric studies, the agency said in a statement on its website. ()

Invokana is expected to generate sales in 2016 of around $468 million, according to analysts' estimates compiled by Thomson Reuters.

Known chemically as canagliflozin, Invokana is a member of a new class of diabetes treatments called sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors that lower blood sugar by blocking reabsorbtion of glucose and increasing its excretion in urine.

Earlier this year, an advisory committee to the FDA discussed the benefits and risks of canagliflozin with a focus on any potential increased risk of heart attack or stroke.

A clinical study of patients at especially high risk of cardiovascular disease showed that within the first 30 days, 13 patients taking canagliflozin suffered a major cardiovascular event compared with just one patient taking a placebo. After that, the imbalance was reversed. The drug also caused a slight increase in unhealthy LDL cholesterol.

In January, 2012, the FDA rejected a similar drug, dapagliflozin, made by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co and AstraZeneca Plc, citing concerns over a possible increased risk of cancer and liver injury. The drug was subsequently approved in Europe under the brand name Forxiga.

In January 2013, Britain's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which decides whether drugs should be paid for on the state health service, declined to recommend that Forxiga be reimbursed and asked the companies for more information.

Diabetes affects the body's ability to metabolize glucose, which is needed for energy. Glucose circulates throughout the bloodstream, is filtered by the kidneys, and returned to body by glucose-specific transporters. By blocking the amount of glucose reabsorbed into the bloodstream, more is excreted in urine.

Left untreated, diabetes can cause nerve damage, kidney disease and blindness. It affects roughly 25.8 million people in the United States, according to the American Diabetes Association.

Despite FDA's rejection of dapagliflozin, and a broad association in the class with genital infections, several companies are still developing SGLT2 inhibitors, including Astellas Pharma Inc, which recently filed for Japanese approval of its ipragliflozin, and Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly & Company, which recently filed for U.S. approval of their drug, empagliflozin.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Ex-Freddie execs lose bid to toss SEC lawsuit

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ex-Freddie execs lose bid to toss SEC lawsuit
Mar 29th 2013, 20:03

NEW YORK, March 29 | Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:03pm EDT

NEW YORK, March 29 (Reuters) - Former Freddie Mac chief executive Richard Syron and three other one-time executives lost their bid to escape a U.S. regulator's lawsuit accusing them of misleading investors about the company's exposure to risky mortgage loans.

U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan partially granted but otherwise denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, one of the biggest enforcement actions brought against executives spilling out of the financial crisis.

Sullivan in his Thursday ruling sided with the SEC, finding the lawsuit's allegations supported a plausible inference that Syron and Patricia Cook, Freddie Mac's former chief business officer, misrepresented the company's subprime exposure.

He also rejected the defendants' contention even if Syron and Cook verbally misrepresented Freddie's exposure, investors could have looked to detailed quantitative information to calculate its subprime exposure.

"In this case, the Court cannot conclude that no reasonable investor could have found the alleged misrepresentations and omissions to be material in light of the quantitative disclosures," Sullivan wrote.

The judge also allowed SEC claims against Donald Bisenius, a former executive vice president for Freddie's single family guarantee business.

Lawyers for Syron and Cook did not respond to requests for comment. Daniel Beller, a lawyer for Bisenius, declined comment. A spokesman for the SEC did not respond to a request for comment.

Syron, Cook and Beller were hit with the SEC lawsuit in December 2011, as the agency launched a similar lawsuit against three ex-Fannie Mae executives, including former chief executive Daniel Mudd.

U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty denied the Fannie executives' bids to dismiss the case against them August 2012.

In the Freddie Mac case, Syron and the other defendants also argued they were exempt from liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since Freddie, as a government-sponsored corporation, was an independent U.S. establishment.

Sullivan rejected that argument, saying "had Congress in 1970 or at any time since then wished to designate Freddie Mac as an independent establishment, it would have done so."

The case is: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Syron, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New york, No. 11-09201.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 4-More trouble for Cohen's SAC Capital as Steinberg indicted in NY

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 4-More trouble for Cohen's SAC Capital as Steinberg indicted in NY
Mar 29th 2013, 18:32

Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:32pm EDT

By Nate Raymond and Matthew Goldstein

March 29 (Reuters) - U.S. prosecutors on Friday charged Michael Steinberg, a veteran portfolio manager at Steven A. Cohen's hedge fund, with insider trading in two technology stocks, the most senior SAC Capital Advisors' employee to be indicted in the government's long-running probe.

FBI agents arrested Steinberg at his Park Avenue home in New York City at around 6 a.m. EDT (1000 GMT). Steinberg, wearing a blue sweater, pleaded "not guilty" to charges of securities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities when he appeared at a late morning arraignment.

The five-count indictment charges Steinberg, 40, with using inside information to trade shares of computer maker Dell Inc and chipmaker Nvidia Corp in 2008 and 2009 that generated about $1.4 million in illegal profits for Cohen's $15 billion hedge fund.

In a related civil complaint against Steinberg, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said the information allowed Steinberg to generate $6.4 million in profits and avoided losses for the hedge fund.

Barry Berke, Steinberg's lawyer, said in a statement that his client had done "absolutely nothing wrong" and his "trading decisions were based on detailed analysis."

The charges come after a tumultuous six months for Cohen, one of the most successful hedge fund traders. It began with last November's arrest of former SAC portfolio manager Mathew Martoma in what prosecutors had described as the largest U.S. insider-trading case.

Martoma pleaded not guilty to charges of insider trading in Elan Corp and Wyeth that allegedly resulted in profits and avoided losses totaling $276 million.

SAC Capital agreed two weeks ago to pay a $616 million penalty to the SEC to settle allegations of improper trading by the firm arising out of the Martoma investigation and alleged improper trading in Dell and Nvidia. SAC neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing as part of that settlement.

But a federal judge on Thursday said he was reserving his decision on approving the deal.

Mounting concern over the insider trading probe prompted outside investors in SAC Capital to submit redemption notices last month to withdraw up to $1.68 billion from Cohen's firm. Several outside investors, including Blackstone Group, declined to comment on Steinberg's arrest.

Cohen, a multi-billionaire, has not been charged with any wrongdoing. A well-known art collector, he recently purchased Pablo Picasso's "Le Reve" from casino owner Stephen Wynn for $155 million and, according to The New York Times, bought a $60 million oceanfront home in East Hampton, N.Y.

$3 MILLION BOND

Steinberg is one of nine current or former employees of SAC Capital who have been charged or implicated with insider trading while working at Cohen's two-decade-old hedge fund.

His arrest had been widely expected after Jon Horvath, a former SAC analyst who reported to Steinberg, pleaded guilty last year to using illegally obtained information to trade in Dell. Horvath has been cooperating with the government and had implicated Steinberg.

Steinberg was suspended last autumn from his post at SAC Capital's Sigma Capital division and remains on paid leave.

SAC Capital spokesman Jonathan Gasthalter said: "Mike has conducted himself professionally and ethically during his long tenure at the firm. We believe him to be a man of integrity."

Prosecutors have introduced emails that they said indicated Steinberg had access to inside information about potential weakness in Dell's earnings, in advance of the personal computer maker's August 2008 results announcement.

Federal authorities contend the improper trading by Steinberg largely involved short positions and derivative trades. The trades involving shares of Dell occurred in August 2008, while the trading in Nvidia took place in May 2009.

The SEC complaint said some of the trading in Dell was done by a SAC portfolio called SAC Select. People familiar with SAC Select said it used computer-driven trading strategies to mimic the trades of some of SAC Capital's top portfolio managers.

The complaint against Steinberg made no reference to Cohen, unlike the criminal and civil cases filed by against Martoma, which was the first time authorities had alluded to him as the "owner" of the hedge fund.

Steinberg had been moving among several hotels in New York City in recent weeks, according to Reuters sources, as he wanted to avoid being arrested at his Upper East Side home where he lives with his wife and two children.

Following the arraignment before U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in lower Manhattan on Friday morning, Steinberg was released after agreeing to post $3 million in bond, which was secured by $1 million in property.

During the proceeding, a federal prosecutor said no search warrant was served on the hedge fund in connection with the charges against Steinberg.

In announcing the $616 million settlement with SAC Capital, lawyers with the SEC made clear the deal did not preclude further charges against individuals or from other trading at SAC Capital that is still be investigated. As part of that settlement, SAC Capital agreed to pay $14 million to settle charges of improper trading in Dell.

On Thursday, a federal district judge reviewing the part of the settlement involving trading in shares of Elan and Wyeth, now a part of Pfizer, said he was reserving decision for now.

The cases in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York are: United States v. Steinberg, No. 12-cr-121, and Securities and Exchange Commission v. Steinberg, No. 13-2082.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPS to forfeit $40 mln over illegal online pharmacy shipments

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPS to forfeit $40 mln over illegal online pharmacy shipments
Mar 29th 2013, 18:27

March 29 | Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:27pm EDT

March 29 (Reuters) - United Parcel Service Inc has agreed to forfeit $40 million it earned from illegal Internet pharmacies shipping drugs using its services, U.S. authorities said Friday.

As part of the settlement, UPS entered a non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice.

The company also agreed to put a compliance program into place to prevent illegal online pharmacies from distributing drugs through its shipping services in the future, authorities said.

"Good corporate citizens like UPS play an important role in halting the flow of illegal drugs that degrade our nation's communities," Northern California U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag said in a statement.

UPS cooperated with the investigation, prosecutors said.

Prosecutors said UPS was on notice from 2003 to 2010 that Internet pharmacies were shipping drugs without prescriptions, yet the company didn't put procedures in place to shut down their accounts.

"We believe we have an obligation and responsibility to help curb the sale and shipment of drugs sold through illegal Internet pharmacies," said Susan Rosenberg, a UPS spokeswoman.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Couple settles Nexen insider trading charges for $3.3 mln-SEC

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Couple settles Nexen insider trading charges for $3.3 mln-SEC
Mar 29th 2013, 17:38

WASHINGTON, March 29 | Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:38pm EDT

WASHINGTON, March 29 (Reuters) - U.S. securities regulators on Friday said a Chinese businessman and his wife accused of insider trading in a case involving China-based CNOOC Ltd's successful bid for Canada's Nexen Inc have agreed to settle charges against them for $3.3 million.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said that the couple will settle charges that they stocked up on Nexen shares while possessing non-public information about a pending announcement that the energy company was being acquired by CNOOC Ltd.

CNOOC said in July 2012 that it had agreed to acquire Nexen for $15.1 billion, China's biggest-ever foreign takeover bid. Shares of Nexen jumped almost 52 percent that day.

The SEC got an emergency court order to freeze multiple trading accounts after suspicious trading in Nexen stock was suspected.

The agency's complaint alleged that in the days before the announcement, Hong Kong-based firm Well Advantage Limited and other unknown traders bought Nexen stock based on confidential details about the deal.

That probe identified Ren Feng and his wife, Zeng Huiyu, as previously unknown traders, the SEC said.

The agreement is subject to court approval.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Republic Bank of Chicago, Danversbank among Fed borrowers in Q1 '11

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Republic Bank of Chicago, Danversbank among Fed borrowers in Q1 '11
Mar 29th 2013, 17:59

NEW YORK, March 29 | Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:59pm EDT

NEW YORK, March 29 (Reuters) - Republic Bank of Chicago and Danversbank were among the largest borrowers from the U.S. Federal Reserve's emergency lending program in early 2011, according to data released on Friday.

But overall lending through the discount window in the first quarter of 2011 fell by more than half from the previous quarter, Fed data showed, suggesting banks saw less need for the kind of emergency funds that they tapped during the height of the financial crisis.

Republic Bank of Chicago borrowed a total of $276 million across 10 loans during the first quarter of 2011, the Federal Reserve reported for the January through March period.

The bank wanted to make sure it had enough cash on hand for its clients in check-cashing services as tax refunds began rolling in, president and chief executive William H. Sperling said.

"We wanted to make sure we had enough cash for our customers," Sperling said, adding that the bank did not have liquidity problems.

"We did it just to make sure we weren't caught short," he added.

Sperling said the bank has used the discount window only in much smaller amounts since then to test their systems.

The discount window is the Fed's regular facility for providing emergency cash to banks in difficulty. In normal times it is rarely used, in part because banks fear the stigma of having sought emergency help from the central bank.

Lending ramped up as the financial crisis exploded but has since eased. Banks took a total of $1.6 billion in the first quarter of 2011, less than half the $3.7 billion in the last quarter of 2010.

Also near the top of the latest list was Danversbank in Massachusetts, with $210 million, which was bought by People's United Financial later in 2011.

People's United declined to comment.

The Fed began releasing the data earlier last year, albeit with a two-year lag, under the terms of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law. The central bank had lobbied to keep such lending figures private for fear it could create a stigma for emergency loans in the future.

The Fed data can be found at:

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Obama touts infrastructure in Florida trip focused on economy

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Obama touts infrastructure in Florida trip focused on economy
Mar 29th 2013, 18:48

Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:48pm EDT

* "Let's rebuild this country," president says

* Unclear if Congress will support proposals

By Jeff Mason

MIAMI, March 29 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama walked into the mouth of a giant tunnel in Miami on Friday to highlight proposals to boost investment in U.S. infrastructure, a move designed to show a leader still focused on the economy in the midst of broader policy battles in Washington.

Obama's tour of the Port of Miami tunnel project and a subsequent speech were aimed at convincing members of the U.S. Congress to back proposals that would leverage taxpayer dollars into funds to rebuild American roads, bridges and other infrastructure.

"My main message is, let's get this done," he said. "Let's rebuild this country that we love."

Obama, as he has in the past, said he wanted to develop a national infrastructure bank and capitalize it with $10 billion. The idea is to pull in private-sector funding and pick projects based on merit.

He would also create "America Fast Forward Bonds" that would help state and local governments attract money for infrastructure projects. These would be direct subsidy bonds in which the issuer would receive a 28 percent subsidy of the borrowing cost as a way of attracting a wider set of investors.

In addition, Obama would add $4 billion to support two programs that are used to provide grants for infrastructure projects like the Miami tunnel.

It is unclear how far the proposals will go in Congress. Republicans are reluctant to support what they consider government stimulus spending after a much criticized $787 billion stimulus plan that Obama managed to push through Congress in 2009.

The president noted that some people on both sides of the political spectrum, such as labor unions and the Chamber of Commerce, had supported his infrastructure ideas.

"Building bridges and schools, that's not a partisan idea," he said.

Obama was criticized in his first term for focusing too much on his signature policy goal of revamping the U.S. healthcare system, which critics said resulted in him giving less attention to the slow economic recovery.

The White House rejects that charge.

Since his re-election in November and his January inauguration, Obama has steered a policy push focused primarily on passing both immigration reform and tighter gun control measures.

However, his State of the Union address in February included a series of measures to boost the economy, and the Florida trip fleshed out some of those ideas.

Alan Krueger, Obama's chief economist, told reporters traveling with Obama on Air Force One that the three main proposals outlined by the president would cost some $21 billion but that cuts would be made elsewhere to avoid increasing the budget deficit.

Obama's fiscal 2014 budget proposal, which will be released on April 10, would spell out how they are paid for, he said. All of the proposals require congressional approval.

Although Obama will not run for re-election again, Florida is still important for him and his fellow Democrats. The political swing state backed the president in 2012 and will be critical to determining whether a Democrat holds on to the White House or whether a Republican recaptures it in 2016.

The White House believes an increase in infrastructure investment would make the United States more competitive while providing a boost to the construction industry, which is still suffering high levels of unemployment.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: CEZ files complaint with EU against Bulgarian regulators

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
CEZ files complaint with EU against Bulgarian regulators
Mar 29th 2013, 14:11

PRAGUE, March 29 | Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:11am EDT

PRAGUE, March 29 (Reuters) - Czech electricity producer CEZ has filed a complaint with the European Commission against Bulgarian authorities' decision to take steps toward rescinding the firm's licence in the Balkan country, the company said on Friday.

"We have repeatedly faced negative interventions from the side of Bulgarian institutions," Tomas Pleskac, head of CEZ's distribution and foreign activities, said in a statement.

Bulgaria's energy regulator has launched a process to revoke the distribution licences of CEZ, accusing the company of breaking public procurement laws by subcontracting suppliers without holding public tenders. CEZ has denied wrongdoing.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 1-Suncor ordered to close waste-water treatment pond

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 1-Suncor ordered to close waste-water treatment pond
Mar 28th 2013, 22:53

Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:53pm EDT

CALGARY, Alberta, March 28 (Reuters) - Suncor Energy Inc received a corrective action order from Alberta's environment department on Thursday, two years after a pond that discharges treated water into the Athabasca River failed a waste-water toxicity test.

The department has ordered the pond, identified as Pond C, remain closed and that Suncor, Canada's largest oil company, identify the source of the toxicity. It must also enhance monitoring of its treatment pond system and audit its water treatment process.

"We fully support the plans outlined in the order, and will be working hard to implement the actions identified by the regulator," the company said in a statement.

The order is not related to Suncor's spill of contaminated water into the river earlier this week.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 1-Pfizer fails to end lawsuit over Bextra, Celebrex safety

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 1-Pfizer fails to end lawsuit over Bextra, Celebrex safety
Mar 28th 2013, 23:49

Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:49pm EDT

* Class action lawsuit allowed to proceed

* Pfizer said to hide cardiovascular risks of pain drugs

By Jonathan Stempel

March 28 (Reuters) - Pfizer Inc has failed to persuade a federal judge to dismiss a shareholder lawsuit accusing the company of fraudulently misrepresenting the safety of its Celebrex and Bextra pain-relieving drugs.

While dismissing some of the claims, U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain in Manhattan said a reasonable jury could find that Pfizer and several top executives intended to mislead shareholders about the drugs' cardiovascular risks.

"The record is replete with evidence that defendants recognized that Celebrex and Bextra had associated cardiovascular risks, that such risks would be considered material by investors, and that defendants nonetheless misrepresented and actively concealed these risks," she wrote.

The plaintiffs are led by the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana and a class was certified on July 5, 2012.

Pfizer did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A lawyer for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a similar request.

Swain scheduled a final pre-trial conference for July 12 and directed both sides to meet with a federal magistrate judge or an outside mediator to work on a settlement before then.

Concerns about the safety of Celebrex and Bextra began to mount following the release of medical studies in late 2004, when rival Merck & Co withdrew its own Vioxx drug from the market because of associated cardiovascular risks.

Celebrex sales totaled $3.3 billion and Bextra sales totaled $1.29 billion in 2004.

But Pfizer pulled Bextra from the U.S. market in April 2005 at the recommendation of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and sales of Celebrex fell by nearly half that year.

Then in 2009, Pfizer agreed to pay $2.3 billion to settle a U.S. Department of Justice probe into the marketing of Bextra and other drugs.

The New York-based company still sells Celebrex, which is intended to treat arthritis pain and inflammation, as well as acute pain, and whose sales totaled $2.72 billion last year.

Earlier this month, Pfizer won a patent extension giving it marketing exclusivity over the drug, whose chemical name is celecoxib, until December 2015.

The lawsuit covers investors who bought Pfizer stock between Oct. 31, 2000 and Oct. 19, 2005, a period in which the company's share price fell by roughly half and its market value tumbled by well over $100 billion.

Several big investors, including the California pension funds CalPERS and Calstrs, "opted out" of the class last year, enabling them to sue on their own.

Pfizer bought Pharmacia Corp, which originally developed Celebrex and Bextra, in April 2003.

Pfizer shares closed up 22 cents at $28.86 on the New York Stock Exchange. Swain released her opinion after U.S. markets closed.

The case is In re: Pfizer Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 05-md-01688.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.