Friday, November 30, 2012

Reuters: Regulatory News: Falcone, Harbinger seek dismissal of SEC charges

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Falcone, Harbinger seek dismissal of SEC charges
Dec 1st 2012, 03:00

NEW YORK | Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:00pm EST

NEW YORK Nov 30 (Reuters) - Hedge fund manager Philip Falcone on Friday asked a federal judge to dismiss U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges accusing him of market manipulation, giving preferential treatment to certain investors and borrowing cash from his own fund to pay his personal taxes.

The billionaire, who was sued in U.S. District Court in Manhattan in June, said government regulators had no evidence that he had deceived investors or acted outside of the law.

The SEC charged Falcone and his fund, Harbinger Capital Partners, with manipulating the bond prices of bathroom fixtures maker MAAX Holdings Inc between 2006 and 2008.

But Falcone said his actions were motivated by sound investment strategy, not by any attempt to deceive investors.

"Plaintiff believes that perfectly lawful market conductcan be transformed into illegal market manipulation merely by alleging that defendants had manipulative intent," lawyers for Harbinger wrote in a motion to dismiss the case filed on Friday with U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty.

In addition, the government asserted that at the height of the financial crisis, when many of the fund's assets were tied up in the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Falcone let select investors get out while denying that opportunity to others. The SEC also claimed Falcone illegally loaned himself $113 million from the fund to pay his taxes, leaving investors unable to access their own money.

In Friday's court filing, Falcone said governing documents explicitly allowed him to give certain investors preferential liquidity. He also claimed the loan was approved by his outside counsel.

An SEC spokesman declined to comment on the filing.

The SEC's action came one month after LightSquared, a wireless communications company that had over time become Harbinger's biggest investment, filed for bankruptcy, raising questions about Falcone's future in the $2 trillion hedge fund industry.

The cases are Securities and Exchange Commission v. Harbinger Capital Partners LLC et al., No. 12-5028, and Securities and Exchange Commission v. Philip A. Falcone et al., No. 12-5027, both in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Entergy says ruling will not affect Vermont Yankee nuclear plant

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Entergy says ruling will not affect Vermont Yankee nuclear plant
Nov 30th 2012, 23:29

HOUSTON | Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:29pm EST

HOUSTON Nov 30 (Reuters) - Entergy Corp officials said an unfavorable ruling issued on Friday by the Vermont Public Service Board will have no immediate impact on operation of the 620-megawatt Vermont Yankee nuclear plant.

In a long-running dispute between Entergy and Vermont officials over the future of the 40-year-old reactor, the board rejected Entergy's request to amend previous orders that prohibited operation of the plant after March 2012 without state approval.

"The Vermont Public Service Board denied a request by Entergy to amend two orders issued by the board in 2002 and 2006," said James Sinclair, communications director for Vermont Yankee. "We had asked for amendments so that our operation would conform to these orders."

Entergy is also seeking board approval of an application to renew the plant's "certificate of public good."

The board described the denial as "narrow" and that it does not address the merits of modifying or extending Entergy Vermont Yankee's obligations under existing orders.

Elected officials and environmental groups want Vermont Yankee to shut, based on an agreement Entergy made when it purchased the plant in 2002.

However, a federal appeals court in June rejected the state's challenge to a new 20-year operating license issued to Vermont Yankee in 2011 by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

"It's a further statement that Entergy continues to operate Vermont Yankee in violation of board orders," said Sandra Levine of the Conservation Law Foundation which is a party in the case.

"Entergy should be obliged to shut down the plant," Levine said.

New Orleans-based Entergy is the third largest operator of U.S. nuclear plants behind Exelon Corp and Duke Energy .

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: US lawmakers cry 'fowl' over move to help lesser prairie chicken

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
US lawmakers cry 'fowl' over move to help lesser prairie chicken
Nov 30th 2012, 22:56

By Ros Krasny

WASHINGTON | Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:56pm EST

WASHINGTON Nov 30 (Reuters) - A move by U.S. authorities to consider placing a small grassland bird native to parts of the oil and gas belt on the Endangered Species List has drawn the ire of some Western lawmakers.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Friday announced a plan to consider having the lesser prairie chicken listed as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act.

The lesser prairie chicken is a medium-sized, gray-brown grouse, smaller and paler than the greater prairie chicken, its close relative.

Once found in abundant numbers across much of Southeastern Colorado, Eastern New Mexico, the Texas Panhandle, Western Oklahoma and Western Kansas, the lesser prairie-chicken's historical range of native grasslands and prairies has been reduced by an estimated 84 percent, the service said.

Lawmakers in major oil and gas producing districts immediately cried foul.

"A listing will have permanent economic consequences for the people of Texas who live and work in the Permian Basin and the Texas Panhandle," said Representative Michael Conaway, a Republican.

Conaway's sprawling West Texas district produces much of the state's oil and about one-quarter of its gas.

Protecting the lesser prairie-chicken "could drive ranching families and energy producers out of business," said Republican Representative Randy Neugebauer, whose district in East-Central Texas is a large agricultural area.

New Mexico's Steve Pearce, chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus, said federal species regulation was being "driven by lawyers for extreme interest groups."

"Listing cannot come soon enough for the lesser prairie chicken," said Taylor Jones, endangered species advocate for WildEarth Guardians, a Santa Fe environmental group that at one point sued the federal government in an attempt to protect the birds from oil and gas drilling.

The Fish and Wildlife Service has opened a 90-day comment period on the lesser prairie-chicken and is seeking input from the public and from the scientific community before making its final decision. Four public hearings will be held in February.

In the meantime, a number of state and federal agencies are working on a voluntary conservation planning effort to conserve the bird's habitat.

"Regardless of whether the lesser prairie-chicken ultimately requires protection under the ESA, its decline is a signal that our native grasslands are in trouble," said Benjamin Tuggle, Regional Director for the Service's Southwest Region.

"We know that these grasslands support not only dozens of native migratory bird and wildlife species, but also farmers, ranchers and local communities across the region," Tuggle said.

Lesser prairie chickens are considered "vulnerable," a step short of endangered, by the UK-based International Union for Conservation of Nature, whose "red list" tracks the conservation status of various species worldwide.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Raising IOER rate the first step to tightening -Fed's Stein

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Raising IOER rate the first step to tightening -Fed's Stein
Nov 30th 2012, 23:27

BOSTON | Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:27pm EST

BOSTON Nov 30 (Reuters) - A top Federal Reserve official said on Friday that the first stage to tightening monetary policy will be raising the interest rate that the U.S. central bank pays financial institutions to park their excess reserves there.

Fed Governor Jeremy Stein, speaking at a conference hosted by the Boston Fed, said raising the so-called interest on excess reserves (IOER) rate would be a straight-forward process, when the time is right. For now, the Fed's policy is very accommodative.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: US Supreme Court to review lawsuits over flaws in generic drugs

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
US Supreme Court to review lawsuits over flaws in generic drugs
Nov 30th 2012, 21:58

Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:58pm EST

* Generic drug makers trying to fend off personal injury cases

* Woman suffered near-blindness, skin damage in drug reaction

By Terry Baynes and Jonathan Stempel

Nov 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to consider whether generic drug manufacturers can be subjected to personal injury lawsuits that allege flaws in the design of drugs, even if federal law would not allow such cases to go forward.

The court agreed to review a bid by Mutual Pharmaceutical Co to overturn a $21 million jury award to Karen Bartlett, a New Hampshire woman who had taken its generic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac for shoulder pain.

Bartlett was left with permanent near-blindness and burn-like lesions on two-thirds of her body after suffering a rare hypersensitivity reaction associated with the drug, and sued Mutual for alleged design defects under New Hampshire law.

Mutual, an indirect unit of Japan's Takeda Pharmaceutical Co , countered that federal law barred such claims because its drug had already been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and federal law requires generic drugs to have the same design as their brand-name equivalents.

It cited the Supreme Court's June 2011 decision in Pliva Inc v. Mensing that federal law preempted state law claims based on alleged inadequate label warnings about potential side effects, given that federal regulations require brand-name and generic drugs to carry the same labels.

But in May, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston refused to extend this ruling to design defect claims, and upheld Bartlett's award.

In its appeal to the Supreme Court, Mutual said "scores" of federal and state courts had rejected the 1st Circuit's "remarkable claim" that generic drug manufacturers could be liable under state law for refusing to stop selling their federally approved products.

Bartlett countered that the Supreme Court should not take the case, saying that lower courts were not divided over the issue, and that her award was based on New Hampshire law and that did not conflict with federal law.

The Generic Pharmaceutical Association submitted a brief in support of Mutual's appeal. A decision by the Supreme Court is expected by the end of June.

The case is Mutual Pharmaceutical Co v. Bartlett, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-142.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Regulators aim to restore balance of power with Duke deal

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Regulators aim to restore balance of power with Duke deal
Nov 30th 2012, 22:18

By Ernest Scheyder

Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:18pm EST

Nov 30 (Reuters) - North Carolina utility regulators' No. 1 goal in negotiating a settlement with Duke Energy Corp and board shake-up: restore the spirit of the original Duke-Progress Energy merger.

The agreement, which outlines Chief Executive Jim Rogers' retirement when his contract expires in December 2013, calls for two new independent board members, a mandatory retirement age of 71 and provisions to protect legacy Progress employees.

Given that North Carolina is Duke's largest market, the settlement shows that state's regulators are willing to flex their muscle well beyond routine electricity rate-setting hearings.

"They're not IBM or Exxon, they're a regulated utility," Robert Gruber, executive director of the public staff of the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC), said of Duke. "It's appropriate for the commission to regulate the merger."

The commission felt slighted when Rogers took control of the combined company in July after the $18 billion buyout of Progress closed, according to commission hearing testimony. When the deal was first announced in January 2011, commissioners had been told Bill Johnson of Progress would take the helm of what became the largest U.S. power utility.

The unexpected move to replace Johnson within hours of the deal's closure caught many off guard, and quickly became a hot-button topic throughout North Carolina and on Wall Street. Johnson is slated to become CEO of the Tennessee Valley Authority in January.

"What the commission is trying to do here is restore some of the balance that the original merger contemplated before the board took over and threw Johnson out," said Gruber.

Johnson's exit prompted the commission to immediately launch an investigation.

The settlement announced on Thursday night hinged little on Rogers, as the Duke board had not talked about Rogers staying on past the end of his contract, according to a person close to the company.

The commission had always expected Rogers would retire when his contract expired, Gruber said.

Still, in negotiations with the utility commission Duke pushed back over required lower-level management changes and opposed regulatory intervention into its corporate governance. But ultimately the company decided it wanted to put the issue behind it, the person said.

Duke had already formed a search committee to find Rogers' replacement earlier this fall and has hired executive search firm Russell Reynolds Associates, the person said. Russell Reynolds didn't return phone calls seeking comment.

The search committee originally formed by Duke had seven members: four legacy Duke directors and three legacy Progress directors. With the settlement, the committee will now have eight members, split equally between the legacy companies.

When a new board member joins Duke, he or she will join the search committee, according to the settlement.

"Whether or not you agree that a commission should be able to dictate management changes and board changes, I think an independent CEO and board member will be a good step in improving overall stewardship," Morningstar analyst Andrew Bischof said.

The market seemed to echo that sentiment, as shares of Duke traded up more than 2 percent on the day, outperforming the broader market.

"This hopefully moves the commission and Duke forward," said Sam Watson, general counsel for the NCUC.

Duke declined to say which board members will constitute the search committee. Through a spokesman, Rogers declined to comment.

Charles Pryor Jr, a former Progress Energy board member who voted for the merger and is prohibited by the settlement from re-joining the board, expressed hope the company would move beyond the recent controversy.

"Whatever Duke's obligations are under the regulatory compact, obviously the commission felt that they fell short," Pryor said. "That's the basis upon which all the other terms of the agreement were set down."

The North Carolina Utilities Commission is facing change itself.

Two of the seven commissioners have terms that expire in June. Edward Finley's term as chairman of the commission also expires in June, although his term as commissioner extends to June 2019.

Gruber, the executive director of the commission's public staff, which advocates for consumers, has said he plans to retire next year.

The incoming North Carolina governor, Republican Pat McCrory, who would appoint new commissioners, is a former Duke Energy employee.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Senator Shelby seeks hearing on SEC's cybersecurity lapse

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Senator Shelby seeks hearing on SEC's cybersecurity lapse
Nov 30th 2012, 19:55

By Sarah N. Lynch

WASHINGTON | Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:55pm EST

WASHINGTON Nov 30 (Reuters) - A leading Senate Republican is seeking a hearing to explore the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's failure to encrypt some computers containing highly sensitive stock exchange data.

Staff for Senator Richard Shelby this week told Senate Banking Chairman Tim Johnson's staff that they believe a hearing is in order, after they were briefed by SEC officials about the security lapse, a senior Senate Republican aide told Reuters.

The security lapses were detailed in a non-public Aug. 30 report by Interim Inspector General Jon Rymer that has been reviewed by Reuters.

Only the chairman of a congressional panel has the authority to call a hearing. A Democratic aide for the Senate Banking Committee said, "The Committee has begun its bipartisan due diligence, including a briefing with the SEC and the Interim Inspector General, and will continue to examine the situation."

The August report found that a group of people in the SEC's Trading and Markets Division did not encrypt computers, iPads and other devices containing confidential data from the exchanges and clearing agencies they were overseeing.

Those employees were responsible for reviewing the cyber security policies and practices at the exchanges, and urged exchanges to tighten up their cyber protections at the same time they were using unprotected computers themselves.

They also brought the devices to a Black Hat convention, where cyber experts convene to discuss hacking and other trends.

An outside firm hired by the SEC found no evidence that any of the data was compromised. The SEC has said that two of the employees involved have left the agency, and the SEC has tightened up its policies since the incident.

On Thursday, the SEC announced that Todd Scharf, the agency's chief information security officer, would take on an expanded role of helping to coordinate on security issues with regulated entities such as exchanges. The SEC did not mention the security lapse in its statement.

But exchanges and clearing agencies are not comforted, partly because the inspector general's report says only "several select laptops" of 28 were tested for potential breaches.

They are pushing the SEC for more details about what kind of data was on the computers, how extensive the testing was, and whether they might need to make changes to their systems.

The New York Stock Exchange has gone so far as to hire former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to help look into the matter.

Options Clearing Corp is working with the SEC to strengthen procedures for the future, said OCC Chief Security Officer Dan DeWaal in an e-mailed statement. "With respect to data that may have been exposed, the SEC is working with the (self-regulatory organizations) impacted."

Exchanges are hoping for details of an analysis conducted by Stroz Friedberg, the firm hired by the SEC to do the testing.

Exchanges are particularly annoyed that the SEC waited until October of this year to inform them of the incident, even though the inspector general's office had been investigating the matter since early 2011.

Earlier this week, staffers from the Senate Banking and Homeland Security and Government Affairs committees were briefed by SEC officials about the inspector general's report. Staff for Republican Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa are also expected to meet with SEC officials.

Representative Randy Neugebauer, the Republican chairman of the House Financial Services oversight subcommittee, said in a statement on Friday that he was disappointed by the security problems at the SEC.

"It appears no information was compromised, which is fortunate," said Neugebauer of Texas. "But leaving sensitive market information unprotected shows a frightening lapse of judgment by the SEC."

There are only a few weeks left in the current session of Congress, which is focused on trying to reach agreement to avoid automatic spending cuts and tax increases set to go into effect early next year unless it acts. In addition, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro has announced she will step down from her post in two weeks.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: SEC charges ex-banker with insider trading in Burger King

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
SEC charges ex-banker with insider trading in Burger King
Nov 30th 2012, 19:02

Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:02pm EST

Nov 30 (Reuters) - A former Brazilian banker agreed to pay nearly $5.2 million to settle U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges of insider trading in Burger King Holdings Inc options before the restaurant chain agreed to a September 2010 buyout.

The SEC said the settlement with the former banker Igor Cornelsen and Bainbridge Group Inc, the firm in which he made his trades, includes a $3.36 million fine, the disgorgement of $1.68 million of illegal profit, and $136,621 of interest. It requires court approval.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: INSIGHT-UPDATE 1-EBay's double tax base prompts calls for investigation

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
INSIGHT-UPDATE 1-EBay's double tax base prompts calls for investigation
Nov 30th 2012, 19:37

Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:37pm EST

By Tom Bergin

LONDON Nov 30 (Reuters) - Britain and Germany may have missed out on a combined $1 billion in sales tax since online marketplace eBay picked a tiny Luxembourg office as its base for EU sales, a shift that lawmakers say should now be investigated.

EBay's nomination of Luxembourg unit eBay Europe Sarl - with a staff of nine - as its provider of services to EU clients allows it to charge customers in Europe a low rate of sales tax, often known as Value Added Tax, helping it to compete against rivals.

However, the unit doesn't actually receive the money from sales. Instead, eBay said it continues to channel revenues through a Berne-based unit, allowing the company also to benefit from what Swiss tax lawyers say is the most competitive corporate income tax regime in Europe.

EU rules allow companies to establish subsidiaries in Luxembourg and levy VAT at Luxembourg's low VAT rate on sales to customers across the bloc.

However, the rules also allow individual EU taxmen to challenge any claim to Luxembourg residence, and the right to charge Luxembourg VAT, in their domestic courts, if the taxman feels a Luxembourg-based subsidiary does not have sufficient staff or assets to support its claim to be the true supplier of goods or services.

Tax experts say eBay's arrangement, which appears to give eBay the best of both income and sales tax worlds, could be open to challenge, and lawmakers in the UK and Germany want their taxmen to investigate.

"I hope that HMRC (UK tax authority Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) takes note ... and takes prompt action," said Margaret Hodge, member of parliament and chairman of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), which monitors government finances.

"I will be seeking assurance that they are, next time we take evidence from HMRC," she added. Officials from HMRC are due to testify to the PAC in early December as part of the committee's investigation into tax matters.

Sven Giegold, member of the European Parliament for Germany's Green Party, said he wanted the German tax authorities to "have a very critical look at this".

It is common for companies to seek to reduce their tax bills, and a number of multinationals have established bases in Luxembourg so they can charge customers lower levels of VAT.

EBay said HMRC was aware of all its tax arrangements and that it was confident it met all its tax liabilities in the UK and elsewhere.

"In all countries and at all times, eBay is fully compliant with national, EU and international tax rules (including the OECD) including the remittance of VAT to the appropriate authorities," an eBay spokesman said in an emailed statement.

The UK, German, French and Luxembourg tax authorities declined to comment on eBay, citing rules on taxpayer confidentiality.

LOWER THRESHOLD

Big companies' tax practices have risen to the top of the political agenda in Europe in the past year, with lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with the way in which companies such as search engine company Google pay almost no income tax in countries where they have billions of dollars in sales.

The companies escape liability for income taxes in countries like the UK by arguing the value created by their business, and therefore the location where the profit should be realised, is not the place where the customer resides, but rather in the location where the intellectual property underpinning the product or service is based.

Chas Roy-Chowdhury, head of taxation at the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, said this was a valid economic argument and that if, for example, HMRC wants to claim more income tax from Google, it has to prove the company is generating more value in the UK than it is declaring.

This would require a thorough deconstruction of its business model and supply chain.

However, it is easier to establish liability to VAT, since this tax hinges simply on the location of the buyer and seller.

"The threshold is lower," said Simon Newark, head of VAT at accountants UHY Hacker.

"There are a lot more aspects for HMRC to challenge in VAT than in direct (income) tax."

For tax purposes, the EU deems eBay's online platform an "electronically supplied service", a category that also covers e-Books and music downloads.

Under EU rules, suppliers of such services based within the bloc are supposed to charge EU customers VAT at the rate prevailing in the country where the supplier is based.

A number of suppliers of electronic services, including Amazon.Com Inc and Apple Inc's iTunes have established European headquarters in Luxembourg to enable them to charge customers lower VAT rates than prevail in their customers' countries.

Luxembourg has traditionally charged the lowest standard VAT rates in the European Union. Its 15 percent rate compares with rates of 19-25 percent in most other EU members.

By charging customers VAT at Luxembourg's rate eBay is better able to compete with rivals based elsewhere in the EU, such as Britain's eBid, which must charge customers VAT at the standard UK rate of 20 percent.

However, to be entitled to charge Luxembourg rates, a company has to be able to prove in British, German or EU courts that it is genuinely based in the Grand Duchy.

Companies selling to EU customers from outside the EU - as eBay was until the 2007 nomination of eBay Europe Sarl as supplier to EU clients - must charge European customers VAT at the rate prevailing in the country where the customer resides, and to pay that VAT to the taxman in the customer's country.

There is no definitive checklist that determines the true base of a company and any decision by a national court can be challenged in the European Court of Justice. In the UK, HMRC said it approached the matter on a case-by-case basis, and disputes are often resolved in court.

"HMRC will challenge any arrangements where it is claimed that supplies are made from a particular country but the business does not have the necessary resources to make those supplies," a spokesman said.

EUROPE EXPANSION

EBay, which is headquartered in San Jose, California, moved into Europe in 1999 when it established eBay International in Berne. Switzerland's low income tax regime for foreign companies was highly beneficial for the auction site. "We do have a very favourable international tax structure," then-Chief Financial Officer Rajiv Dutta told analysts in 2002 when asked how the company managed to pay such low taxes on its non-U.S. income.

The Swiss base also meant, initially, that the company didn't have to charge EU customers VAT. But in 2003, Brussels changed the rules, which forced eBay to charge EU sellers on its platform VAT based on their residence. The VAT gathered was remitted to the tax authority in the customer's country.

Not all customers are charged VAT. Most medium-sized and big businesses are legitimately exempted from paying VAT on some purchases, such as eBay seller fees.

EBay's Swiss-based European public relations head declined to say what portion of its EU customers were liable to be charged VAT. James Cordwell, equities analyst at Atlantic Equities, estimated that such customers accounted for 40-50 percent of sales in Europe.

Since the 2007 creation of its Luxembourg operation, eBay has had German fee revenues of $6.1 billion and UK revenues of $5 billion, its annual accounts show.

If the services were supplied from Switzerland or another non-EU country, and assuming only half of customers should have been charged VAT, EU rules would have obliged eBay to collect $580 million in VAT for the German taxman and $500 million in VAT for HMRC since 2007.

EBay's entitlement to charge Luxembourg VAT on sales and to pay this to the Luxembourg taxman rests on being able to prove in court that eBay Europe Sarl is the provider of services to EU clients.

But despite German and UK fee income of $3.1 billion last year, eBay Europe Sarl recorded turnover of only 5 million euros in 2011.

John Hemming, an MP with the Liberal Democrats, the junior partner in the British coalition government, said the fact eBay's sales revenues did not go through the Luxembourg unit undermined the claim that it was the true provider of services to EU clients.

"If it's a real transaction, you would expect the money to pass with it, and not pass someplace else," he said.

Rather than going to Luxembourg, the money generated from customers continues to go to Berne-based eBay International AG, a spokeswoman said.

When Reuters visited in mid November, staff at the Luxembourg office, just opposite the central post office, declined to discuss what operations the unit conducted for eBay.

A spokesman later said the office conducted activities including billing, data privacy, contracting, regulatory, management and some customer services operations.

By contrast, Amazon and iTunes do report their sales of ebooks and music downloads to EU customers through their Luxembourg units.

Prem Sikka, professor of accounting at Essex University, along with Newark and Roy-Chowdhury said a cash trail through a unit was one of the key factors used as evidence that the unit was the true supplier of a service.

UK and German tax authorities could argue that the shift in eBay's supply base to Luxembourg from Berne was therefore not genuine. If successful, they could claim back the VAT lost.

EBay declined to say why it channelled sales through Switzerland. Tax advisors say the country can still offer some companies lower tax rates than other European low-tax jurisdictions such as Ireland and Luxembourg.

Indeed, EBay's closest rival Amazon, which channels about half its non-U.S. earnings through Luxembourg, reported average income tax on overseas earnings of 6 percent in the past four years. EBay paid just 3 percent over the same period.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 1-SEC charges ex-banker over Burger King insider trading

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 1-SEC charges ex-banker over Burger King insider trading
Nov 30th 2012, 20:03

Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:03pm EST

* Igor Cornelsen to pay $5.18 million in settlement

* SEC says Cornelsen tipped by broker ahead of 2010 buyout

By Jonathan Stempel

Nov 30 (Reuters) - A former Brazilian banker agreed to pay $5.18 million to settle U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges of insider trading in Burger King Holdings Inc before the second-largest U.S. fast-food chain agreed to a 2010 buyout.

According to the regulator, the former banker, Igor Cornelsen, 64, prodded his broker, Waldyr Da Silva Prado Neto, for tips after Prado, who then worked at Wells Fargo & Co , had learned from a customer that Burger King was up for sale.

Burger King agreed on Sept. 2, 2010, to be bought by private equity firm 3G Capital Partners Ltd for $3.26 billion, or $24 per share.

That was about 46 percent above the share price when rumors that the maker of Whopper hamburgers might be acquired had surfaced two days earlier.

The SEC said Cornelsen had begun trading Burger King call options, a bet the stock would rise, on May 18, 2010, one day after Prado told him in an email written in Portuguese, "I have some info ... You have to hear this."

Cornelsen would subsequently seek tips by sending cryptic emails, saying such things in Portuguese as "Is the sandwich deal going to happen?" the SEC said.

Finally, the regulator said that upon realizing how much he had made after the takeover was announced, Cornelsen exclaimed in an email to Prado, in English this time, "Wow! What a day!"

Friday's settlement requires court approval. It calls for Cornelsen, a resident of the Bahamas, and his firm, Bainbridge Group Inc, to pay a $3.36 million fine, give up $1.68 million of illegal profit and pay $136,621 of interest.

James Benjamin, a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld who represents Cornelsen, had no immediate comment.

The SEC filed related insider trading charges against Prado, 42, on Sept. 20 and won a court order freezing his assets. It said that litigation is continuing.

Now called Burger King Worldwide Holdings Inc, the Miami-based company again became publicly traded on June 20 through a "reverse merger" involving a shell company co-founded by hedge fund manager William Ackman

The case is SEC v. Cornelsen et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: BRIEF-SEC says settles insider trading case over Burger King buyout

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
BRIEF-SEC says settles insider trading case over Burger King buyout
Nov 30th 2012, 18:43

Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:43pm EST

Nov 30 (Reuters) - Burger King Worldwide, Inc. : * SEC says former brazilian banker agrees to settle insider trading case over

his role in scheme to trade Burger King securities * SEC says igor cornelsen and bainbridge group to pay more than $5.1 million to

settle charges * SEC says cornelsen, bainbridge traded in Burger King options before company

agreed in 2010 to be taken private * SEC says cornelsen sought tips from broker with emails carrying masked

references such as "is the sandwich deal going to happen?" * SEC says its litigation continues against the broker

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 1-CME to compensate traders after erroneous wheat report

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 1-CME to compensate traders after erroneous wheat report
Nov 30th 2012, 18:10

Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:10pm EST

CHICAGO Nov 30 (Reuters) - CME Group Inc on Friday said it would compensate traders for losses incurred after the exchange issued an erroneous daily report on the amount of wheat registered for delivery with the Chicago Board of Trade.

The exchange later revised the report.

CME Group reports CBOT registrations as of 4 p.m. Chicago time on each business day. The exchange's initial report, issued shortly after 4 p.m. (2200 GMT) Thursday, showed 164 contracts of CBOT wheat registered for delivery, unchanged from the previous day.

CME on Friday said that figure did not include 2,000 contracts of wheat registered by The Andersons, a commercial grain handler that operates several CBOT wheat delivery elevators.

"CME Group issued an erroneous Deliverable Commodities Under Registration Report shortly after 4 p.m. CST," the exchange said in a statement.

The exchange said it corrected the report on its website at 5:46 p.m. CST (2356 GMT). By that time, electronic trading in CBOT grains for Friday's trade date had already begun, stating at 5 p.m. CST (2300 GMT).

"The company will assume responsibility for actual losses associated with this reporting error," CME said in the statement.

"CME Group will establish a claims process for customers and details will be posted to the website as soon as possible," it said.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Alpha Natural says electrician dies at legacy Massey mine

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Alpha Natural says electrician dies at legacy Massey mine
Nov 30th 2012, 17:52

Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:52pm EST

Nov 30 (Reuters) - An electrician working at a West Virginia mine owned by Alpha Natural Resources Inc was killed on Friday after being struck by a scoop used to transport supplies, becoming the second electrician to die at the mine in less than three years.

State and federal mine safety and health officials are investigating the incident, Alpha Natural said in a statement.

Alpha Natural was not immediately available to comment.

Steven O'Dell, 27, an employee of Alex Energy Inc passed away this morning, Alpha Natural said.

In July 2010, another electrician was killed at the Pocahontas Mine in Greenbrier County, after being run over by a shuttle car, according to the website of West Virginia Office of Miners' Health Safety and Training.

The mine is operated by White Buck Coal Co, previously owned by Massey Energy, which was acquired by Alpha for $7.1 billion in 2011.

On Wednesday, an ex-Massey employee, David Hughart, who was president of a group that controlled White Buck Coal Co, was charged with criminal conspiracy for ignoring safety regulations to boost production, according to court documents.

Hughart is the most senior Massey official to be prosecuted since the Upper Big Branch mine disaster that killed 29 miners, though he was not charged in connection with that accident.

Alpha inherited liabilities from the pending litigation over the Upper Big Branch mine accident in West Virginia, the worst U.S. mine disaster in four decades, when it acquired Massey.

Alpha agreed last December to pay $1.5 million to each of the families of the 29 miners who died as part of a $209 million settlement.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: Brazilian heiress files suit to overturn Merrill ruling

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Brazilian heiress files suit to overturn Merrill ruling
Nov 30th 2012, 16:59

By Suzanne Barlyn

Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:59am EST

Nov 30 (Reuters) - A Brazilian banking heiress who netted $3.6 million in a securities arbitration case against Merrill Lynch stemming from alleged unauthorized trades, is trying to overturn parts of that ruling,which ordered her to pay Merrill some money and denied further damages, according to court documents.

The heiress, Camelia Nasser de Kassin, asked for more than $21 million in damages when she filed a securities arbitration claim against Bank of America Corp.'s Merrill Lynch unit with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in 2008.

Lawyers for de Kassin filed a complaint on Thursday in a Manhattan federal court asking a judge to overturn parts of the ruling, decided on September 11. Arbitrators rendered a split decision finding de Kassin and Merrill both at fault for losses in the Sophin account. Both the arbitration and court case were filed in the name of Sophin Investments SA, a company set up to handle an inheritance Kassin received from an uncle.

The FINRA ruling and newly filed court case are just two facets of a larger battle between members of the prominent Nasser banking family from Brazil and Merrill Lynch over several steep trading losses.

A Merrill Lynch spokesman declined to immediately comment.

In the FINRA arbitration, de Kassin, through Sophin, accused Merrill Lynch of letting her brother, Ezequiel Nasser, make $389 million in unauthorized trades thought accounts at two Merrill Lynch units.

Nasser, who de Kassin alleged invested in risky securities such as "naked puts" - a type of options strategy - in Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers ultimately left a deficit totaling between $10.4 million and $11.4 million in the two accounts.

Merrill denied the claims and filed a counterclaim in the arbitration case against Sophin for breach of contract, seeking a total of $5.5 million for the deficits in the two accounts.

Arbitrators, in September, found both parties liable. While Merrill must pay Sophin $6.1 million, Sophin must pay Merrill $2.5 million - a net of $3.6 million for Sophin. The panel admonished Merrill for "lapses in record keeping and supervisory procedures" but said those missteps did not indicate a widespread problem at the company.

Lawyers for de Kassin, in court papers filed at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argued that the court should overturn portions of the ruling requiring de Kassin to pay damages to Merrill, and other parts of the ruling that deny her further damages.

Lawyers for de Kassin argue that arbitrators disregarded the law and violated U.S. public policy by ignoring that no power of attorney was in place authorizing third-party trades in the Sophin account. But the panel, at the same time, acknowledged "that such conduct had occurred and that it was illegal."

Securities brokerage customers typically agree in their account opening statements to arbitrate legal disputes against their brokerage in FINRA's arbitration forum. Court actions to overturn arbitration rulings, which are generally binding, are unusual.

However, courts can overturn, or vacate, arbitration rulings in limited circumstances, such as when arbitrators are biased or show a "manifest disregard" of the law.

Merrill, in addition to its involvement in the arbitration case, sued three members of the Nasser family in 2008 for massive trading losses, leading to a $99 million judgment in Merril's favor upheld in April by a New York appeals court.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Regulatory News: UPDATE 1-Harper confidante highlights CNOOC-Nexen concerns

Reuters: Regulatory News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
UPDATE 1-Harper confidante highlights CNOOC-Nexen concerns
Nov 30th 2012, 17:21

Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:21pm EST

* Kenney notes rigorous analysis planned for state firms

* Kenney is known to have reservations on CNOOC bid

* Says Canadian values had been neglected in dealing with China

* Says recent investment pact speaks to reciprocity

By Randall Palmer

OTTAWA, Nov 30 (Reuters) - A Canadian cabinet figure known to have reservations about CNOOC Ltd's bid to buy Nexen Inc on Friday underscored Prime Minister Stephen Harper's concerns about takeover bids by foreign state-owned enterprises.

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said Harper had stressed the importance of preserving Canadian values, such as human rights, in dealing with China. But Kenney, a Harper confidante, conceded a foreign investment agreement that Ottawa recently reached with China provided much-needed reciprocity.

Kenney's remarks pointed to the depth of the debate within the government over whether to approve state-owned CNOOC's plan to buy the energy producer.

Shares of Nexen, which were up before Kenney spoke, gave back some their gains afterwards.

"The prime minister...has underscored our government's particular concern about large-scale, proposed acquisitions by state-owned enterprises and the need for a rigorous analysis to be undertaken for such applications," Kenney said when asked about his views on CNOOC during a news conference on Canada's refugee policy.

The government has set a Dec. 10 deadline for deciding whether to approve the deal. Ottawa says that at the same time it will unveil updated guidelines for foreign investment.

When reporters asked if a consensus had formed among cabinet members on how to treat companies owned by the Chinese government, Kenney declined to speak about any deliberations but said:

"Our prime minister has consistently articulated a balanced approach to our relationship with China that emphasizes, yes, our commercial interests, but also our values, in a way that the previous policy was unbalanced, having largely neglected the values dimension of the relationship."

One of the concerns with China's $15.1 billion bid is the possibility that Beijing will scoop up large chunks of Canada's natural resource sector and may not operate purely from commercial motives. Even so, the Canadian government has also spoken of the need for foreign investment to develop its resources.

Harper has stressed repeatedly to Chinese officials that the economic relationship must be a two-way street. Kenney suggested the recent investment agreement had addressed that issue, at least in part.

"One of the key reasons why we finalized the Foreign Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement (FIPPA) after 18 years of negotiations is to provide for a degree of reciprocal protection for investment on both sides," said Kenney, whose reservations about the deal stem in part from his concern over human rights.

In the past, he said, Chinese investors would benefit from Canada's legal protection but Canadians did not have the same protection in China.

"So as far as I'm concerned, the FIPPA gives us a great deal of reciprocity," he said. "Now Canadians will have some enforceable legal remedies to protect their investments in China."

Nexen shares had been under pressure this week because of a possible delay in the U.S. regulatory approval process, but the Canadian government signaled late on Thursday that the U.S. deliberations would not affect Canada's review.

Nexen stock moved as much as 51 Canadian cents higher on Friday morning but gave up about half its gains on Kenney's remarks. At 11:30 a.m. EST (1630 GMT), they were up 26 cents at C$23.52 in Toronto.

When Ottawa decides on CNOOC and the broader foreign investment policy, it is also expected to decide on a C$5.2 billion ($5.3 billion) bid by Malaysia's Petronas for Progress Resources Energy Corp. Its shares were up 27 cents at C$19.80.

CNOOC has offered $27.50 a share for Nexen. The Petronas offer price for Progress is C$22 a share.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.